Tag: donald-trump
-
Alabama House Advances Bill to Strip Phone Numbers from Voter Rolls
The Alabama Legislature passed House Bill 67, altering voter registration data handling by removing phone numbers from official lists and capping access costs at $1,000. The bill, aimed at protecting voter privacy and reducing robocalls, allows voters to opt in for phone number inclusion. It now goes to the Senate for consideration.
-
Pennsylvania Lawmakers Propose Election Protection Bill to Guard Voter Data and Shield Election Workers
A bipartisan group of Pennsylvania legislators has introduced the Protecting Voter Privacy and Pennsylvania Elections from Political Interference Act. This bill aims to secure voter privacy, state control over election systems, and shields election officials from political intimidation. It seeks to restore public confidence in elections amid ongoing debates about election integrity.
-
Secret Money, Loud Consequences: How Dark Cash Is Warping Democratic Primaries
Key Democratic primaries are increasingly influenced by secret money from Super PACs and outside spending groups, undermining voter agency and accountability. Despite Democrats’ public opposition to big money, these entities exploit opaque funding to shape electoral outcomes, raising concerns about the connection between candidates and constituents and the overall integrity of democracy.
-
U.S. Intelligence Oversight Office Investigated Voting Machines Used in Puerto Rico, Report Finds
A U.S. intelligence oversight investigation into voting machines in Puerto Rico was triggered by concerns about potential irregularities. While no evidence of foreign interference or compromised outcomes was found, the review raises questions about the role of intelligence agencies in election oversight and the balance between security and democratic accountability.
-
Maryland Voter ID Debate Returns as Republicans File New Bill
Maryland’s current voting laws do not require photo ID for most voters, but a new Republican proposal seeks to change this by mandating government-issued identification before voting. Supporters argue it enhances election security, while critics warn it may disenfranchise marginalized voters. The bill awaits further legislative action.
-
Virginia Democrats Unveil Aggressive 10–1 Congressional Map as Courts Weigh Redistricting Authority
Virginia Democrats have proposed a “10–1 map” to reshape congressional districts, aiming to secure 10 of 11 House seats. This proposal comes amid legal uncertainty as Virginia’s courts question their role in redistricting. The outcomes may significantly influence the 2026 elections and future redistricting processes nationally.
-
When the Court Steps Aside: California’s Mid-Decade Redistricting and Its National Implications
The U.S. Supreme Court allowed California’s revised congressional map to take effect for the 2026 elections, highlighting ongoing issues in redistricting. While it declined to rule on mid-cycle redistricting’s constitutionality, the decision may encourage other states to explore similar changes. Future challenges will likely focus on concrete violations rather than partisan motives.
-
Iowa Election Law “Tweaks” Advance Through State House Amid Broader 2026 Legislative Activity
A bill proposing changes to Iowa’s election laws has advanced in the House, aiming to streamline candidate petition processes by shifting responsibility to county auditors. Advocates emphasize efficiency and integrity ahead of the 2026 elections, while critics express concerns about the political implications. The proposal still requires further legislative approval.
-
Virginia’s HB 965 and the National Popular Vote Compact: How It Works—and What Changes If It Passes
Virginia lawmakers are considering HB 965, which would allow the state to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. This agreement aims to elect presidents based on the national popular vote instead of the Electoral College system. Critics voice concerns about voter consent and the shift in electoral authority from states to a national standard.
-
What Louisiana v. Callais Means for Voting Rights and Elections
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act prohibits state or local practices from denying the right to vote based on race. It empowers voters to challenge discriminatory laws and practices. The Supreme Court case Louisiana v. Callais may redefine Section 2’s application, impacting minority voting strength and redistricting nationwide.
Election Desk 