Tag: Supreme Court
-
When the Court Steps Aside: California’s Mid-Decade Redistricting and Its National Implications
The U.S. Supreme Court allowed California’s revised congressional map to take effect for the 2026 elections, highlighting ongoing issues in redistricting. While it declined to rule on mid-cycle redistricting’s constitutionality, the decision may encourage other states to explore similar changes. Future challenges will likely focus on concrete violations rather than partisan motives.
-
The Battle to Reform Judicial Selection in South Carolina
Judicial selection in South Carolina, criticized for its opacity, has become a focal point in the 2026 political landscape. Rom Reddy of DOGE SC advocates for reforms to diminish legislative control, allowing the governor to nominate judges. The proposed bill aims to increase accountability, highlighting the need for public trust in the judiciary.
-
Citizens United’s Enduring Influence: How the 2010 Decision Still Shapes American Elections in 2026
On January 21, 2010, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. FEC allowed unlimited corporate and union spending in federal elections, reshaping campaign finance. This decision led to the rise of super PACs and dark money, raising concerns about transparency and voter influence as the political landscape faces ongoing challenges and calls for reform…
-
Supreme Court Opens Door for Bost Election Integrity Lawsuit, Shaping Future Election Law Challenges
On January 14, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections that candidates can challenge state election rules in federal court without proving direct impact on election outcomes. The decision broadens candidate standing in election law disputes, potentially increasing pre-election litigation while leaving the legality of Illinois’ mail-in ballot…
-
25 Years After Bush v. Gore, Election Law Is Still Living in Its Shadow
Twenty-five years after Bush v. Gore, the Supreme Court’s decision still shapes how elections are run, challenged, and decided. From routine post-election lawsuits to expanded judicial intervention, the 2000 ruling continues to influence election law—and public confidence in democratic outcomes.
Election Desk 