Author: Michael Phillips
-
Citizens United’s Enduring Influence: How the 2010 Decision Still Shapes American Elections in 2026
On January 21, 2010, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. FEC allowed unlimited corporate and union spending in federal elections, reshaping campaign finance. This decision led to the rise of super PACs and dark money, raising concerns about transparency and voter influence as the political landscape faces ongoing challenges and calls for reform…
-
Vermont Lawmakers Move to Codify Voting Rights in State Law Amid National Uncertainty
Democratic lawmakers in Vermont proposed the Vermont Voting Rights Act to embed federal voting protections into state law amidst national concerns about voting rights. The bill aims to expand access for historically underrepresented groups, enhance voter protections, and counteract potential federal rollbacks. It is set for legislative consideration soon.
-
What Happens If Congress Is Split After an Election? Institutional Consequences Explained
Federal elections often result in a split Congress, where no single party controls both chambers. This scenario can lead to legislative gridlock, necessitating bipartisan negotiation for progress. Institutional mechanics, like tie-breaking votes in the Senate and the lack of a tie-breaking mechanism in the House, complicate governance and hinder productivity.
-
Ohio Lawmakers Propose Making Election Day a State Holiday
Ohio lawmakers have introduced a bill to designate Election Day as a state holiday to enhance voter access. Proponents argue it would alleviate work-related barriers, especially for low-income workers, while opponents cite concerns over costs and effectiveness. The proposal is set for committee review, highlighting ongoing discussions on voter participation.
-
Utah’s 2026 Legislative Session Begins With Election Law Changes on the Table
Utah’s 2026 legislative session is focusing on election law reforms, highlighted by House Bill 209, which seeks to establish a proof of U.S. citizenship requirement for voting. These changes, alongside previous reforms to mail-in voting, have ignited debates over election administration and voter accessibility, with significant implications for the upcoming elections.
-
Why Federal Forces Are Barred From Polling Places — And What the Law Actually Says
U.S. election law prohibits federal troops and law enforcement from polling places to safeguard voter freedom and prevent intimidation. This principle, rooted in historical statutes like the Posse Comitatus Act, ensures free elections by keeping armed presence away from voting. State laws reinforce this ban, ensuring a non-coercive environment for voters.
-
Mississippi Lawmakers Propose State-Level Voting Rights Act
Democratic lawmakers in Mississippi have proposed a state-level Voting Rights Act to expand voter protections, aiming to restore oversight weakened by Supreme Court rulings. It seeks to prevent discriminatory practices and enhance transparency in elections. While supporters advocate for necessary safeguards, Republican leaders express skepticism, emphasizing compliance with existing federal laws.
-
How States Can Protect Election Integrity and Security
State legislatures are vital in shaping U.S. elections, balancing security and access. The Brennan Center for Justice’s report outlines necessary actions to enhance election integrity without restricting voter participation. Key recommendations include securing voting systems, conducting robust audits, protecting election officials, investing in infrastructure, and maintaining clear rules, emphasizing competence to build public trust.
-
Congressional Power Under the U.S. Constitution: What It Can and Cannot Do on Election Rules
The U.S. Constitution’s Elections Clause grants Congress the power to regulate federal elections, allowing it to override state laws. However, this authority is balanced by constitutional limits and historical practices, with states primarily managing election administration. Proposed reforms face judicial scrutiny and must align with constitutional provisions, emphasizing a dual authority structure.
-
Supreme Court Opens Door for Bost Election Integrity Lawsuit, Shaping Future Election Law Challenges
On January 14, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections that candidates can challenge state election rules in federal court without proving direct impact on election outcomes. The decision broadens candidate standing in election law disputes, potentially increasing pre-election litigation while leaving the legality of Illinois’ mail-in ballot…
Election Desk 