Tag: federal courts
-
How a Single Election Can Reshape Government for a Decade
Down-ballot races, often overlooked during elections, hold significant power in shaping long-term governance. These positions influence judicial decisions, redistricting, election administration, regulatory policies, and legal challenges. With impacts that last beyond election cycles and presidencies, these elections quietly define the political landscape for a decade or more, underscoring their importance.
-
What Louisiana v. Callais Means for Voting Rights and Elections
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act prohibits state or local practices from denying the right to vote based on race. It empowers voters to challenge discriminatory laws and practices. The Supreme Court case Louisiana v. Callais may redefine Section 2’s application, impacting minority voting strength and redistricting nationwide.
-
Judge Blocks New Citizenship Requirements in Latest Setback to Trump Election Executive Order
A federal judge has blocked provisions from former President Trump’s executive order that aimed to impose federal oversight on voter eligibility and citizenship verification. The ruling emphasizes that such changes require congressional approval, reinforcing the constitutional balance of power between state and federal election administration. Future attempts to alter election rules will face scrutiny.
-
Supreme Court Opens Door for Bost Election Integrity Lawsuit, Shaping Future Election Law Challenges
On January 14, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections that candidates can challenge state election rules in federal court without proving direct impact on election outcomes. The decision broadens candidate standing in election law disputes, potentially increasing pre-election litigation while leaving the legality of Illinois’ mail-in ballot…
Election Desk 